Score
15. Who approved the Legal service plan scope?
<--- Score
16. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
17. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
18. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
19. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
20. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
21. Is Legal service plan required?
<--- Score
22. What are the core elements of the Legal service plan business case?
<--- Score
23. Do you all define Legal service plan in the same way?
<--- Score
24. How did the Legal service plan manager receive input to the development of a Legal service plan improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
25. Is special Legal service plan user knowledge required?
<--- Score
26. What Legal service plan requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
27. What happens if Legal service plan’s scope changes?
<--- Score
28. What is the scope of the Legal service plan work?
<--- Score
29. Is the scope of Legal service plan defined?
<--- Score
30. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
31. What is the scope of Legal service plan?
<--- Score
32. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
33. Will a Legal service plan production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
34. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Legal service plan?
<--- Score
35. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
36. When is/was the Legal service plan start date?
<--- Score
37. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
38. Is there a critical path to deliver Legal service plan results?
<--- Score
39. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
40. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
41. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Legal service plan work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
42. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
43. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
44. What is in scope?
<--- Score
45. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Legal service plan results are met?
<--- Score
46. Do you have a Legal service plan success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
47. How do you hand over Legal service plan context?
<--- Score
48. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
49. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
50. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
51. Is Legal service plan currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
52. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
53. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
54. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Legal service plan brings?
<--- Score
55. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
56. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
57. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
58. Who is gathering Legal service plan information?
<---
