<--- Score
103. What sources do you use to gather information for a Student leadership study?
<--- Score
104. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
105. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
106. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
107. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Student leadership leverage and how?
<--- Score
108. What are (control) requirements for Student leadership Information?
<--- Score
109. How did the Student leadership manager receive input to the development of a Student leadership improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
110. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Student leadership brings?
<--- Score
111. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
112. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
113. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
114. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
115. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
116. How will the Student leadership team and the group measure complete success of Student leadership?
<--- Score
117. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
118. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
119. Is Student leadership required?
<--- Score
120. How are consistent Student leadership definitions important?
<--- Score
121. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
122. Are the Student leadership requirements complete?
<--- Score
123. Will team members perform Student leadership work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
124. What is the scope of Student leadership?
<--- Score
125. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
126. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
127. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
128. How have you defined all Student leadership requirements first?
<--- Score
129. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
130. Do you have a Student leadership success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
131. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
132. What system do you use for gathering Student leadership information?
<--- Score
133. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
134. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
135. How do you manage unclear Student leadership requirements?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Student leadership Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
2. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
3. How do you measure efficient delivery of Student leadership services?
<--- Score
4. Among the Student leadership product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
5.
