Who is gathering System of reference information?
<--- Score
106. Will a System of reference production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
107. Have all basic functions of System of reference been defined?
<--- Score
108. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to System of reference changes?
<--- Score
109. What is the scope of the System of reference effort?
<--- Score
110. Who approved the System of reference scope?
<--- Score
111. Is there any additional System of reference definition of success?
<--- Score
112. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform System of reference work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
113. Are the System of reference requirements testable?
<--- Score
114. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
115. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
116. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
117. Has the System of reference work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
118. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
119. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
120. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
121. Is there a clear System of reference case definition?
<--- Score
122. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
123. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does System of reference leverage and how?
<--- Score
124. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
125. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
126. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
127. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
128. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
129. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
130. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the System of reference Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
2. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
3. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
4. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
5. What are hidden System of reference quality costs?
<--- Score
6. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
7. Which System of reference impacts are significant?
<--- Score
8. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
9. What is the total cost related to deploying System of reference, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
10. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
11. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
12. What is the cause of any System of reference gaps?
<--- Score
13. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
14. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<---
