style="font-size:15px;"> 61. What happens if System of reference’s scope changes?
<--- Score
62. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
63. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
64. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
65. Is the scope of System of reference defined?
<--- Score
66. How did the System of reference manager receive input to the development of a System of reference improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
67. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
68. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
69. Who are the System of reference improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
70. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
71. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
72. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
73. How do you catch System of reference definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
74. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
75. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
76. Are accountability and ownership for System of reference clearly defined?
<--- Score
77. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
78. When is/was the System of reference start date?
<--- Score
79. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
80. What are the core elements of the System of reference business case?
<--- Score
81. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
82. Is there a critical path to deliver System of reference results?
<--- Score
83. Is System of reference required?
<--- Score
84. How do you hand over System of reference context?
<--- Score
85. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
86. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
87. How are consistent System of reference definitions important?
<--- Score
88. What System of reference services do you require?
<--- Score
89. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
90. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
91. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
92. How do you gather System of reference requirements?
<--- Score
93. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
94. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
95. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
96. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
97. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
98. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
99. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
100. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that System of reference brings?
<--- Score
101. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
102. What sources do you use to gather information for a System of reference study?
<--- Score
103. Is System of reference linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
104. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
105.
