Score
49. The approach of traditional Game as a service works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
50. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
51. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
52. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
53. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
54. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
55. How can you measure Game as a service in a systematic way?
<--- Score
56. How frequently do you track Game as a service measures?
<--- Score
57. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
58. What are the Game as a service investment costs?
<--- Score
59. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
60. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
61. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
62. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
63. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
64. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
65. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
66. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
67. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
68. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
69. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
70. What are the Game as a service key cost drivers?
<--- Score
71. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
72. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
73. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
74. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
75. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
76. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
77. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
78. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
79. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
80. Among the Game as a service product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
81. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
82. What is your Game as a service quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
83. Are Game as a service vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
84. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
85. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
86. How do you verify if Game as a service is built right?
<--- Score
87. How do you measure efficient delivery of Game as a service services?
<--- Score
88. What is the cause of any Game as a service gaps?
<--- Score
89. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
90. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
91. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
92. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
93. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
94. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
95. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Game as a service services/products?
<--- Score
96. Which Game as a service impacts are
