Score
59. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
60. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
61. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
62. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
63. Will team members regularly document their Game as a service work?
<--- Score
64. How do you catch Game as a service definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
65. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Game as a service?
<--- Score
66. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
67. Has a Game as a service requirement not been met?
<--- Score
68. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
69. Who approved the Game as a service scope?
<--- Score
70. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
71. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
72. What are (control) requirements for Game as a service Information?
<--- Score
73. When is/was the Game as a service start date?
<--- Score
74. Are the Game as a service requirements testable?
<--- Score
75. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
76. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
77. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
78. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
79. How do you think the partners involved in Game as a service would have defined success?
<--- Score
80. Is there a clear Game as a service case definition?
<--- Score
81. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
82. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
83. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
84. What sources do you use to gather information for a Game as a service study?
<--- Score
85. Are the Game as a service requirements complete?
<--- Score
86. What was the context?
<--- Score
87. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
88. What is the scope of Game as a service?
<--- Score
89. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
90. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Game as a service results are met?
<--- Score
91. Is the scope of Game as a service defined?
<--- Score
92. What would be the goal or target for a Game as a service’s improvement team?
<--- Score
93. How have you defined all Game as a service requirements first?
<--- Score
94. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
95. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
96. What is the definition of Game as a service excellence?
<--- Score
97. What are the Game as a service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
98. What happens if Game as a service’s scope changes?
<--- Score
99. Who is gathering Game as a service information?
<--- Score
100. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
101. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
102. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
103. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
104.
