there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
15. Is special Game as a service user knowledge required?
<--- Score
16. Will team members perform Game as a service work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
17. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
18. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
19. Is the Game as a service scope manageable?
<--- Score
20. How do you manage unclear Game as a service requirements?
<--- Score
21. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
22. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
23. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
24. How did the Game as a service manager receive input to the development of a Game as a service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
25. What Game as a service requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
26. What are the core elements of the Game as a service business case?
<--- Score
27. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
28. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Game as a service leverage and how?
<--- Score
29. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
30. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
31. Is Game as a service currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
32. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
33. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
34. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
35. How do you manage changes in Game as a service requirements?
<--- Score
36. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
37. What system do you use for gathering Game as a service information?
<--- Score
38. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
39. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
40. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
41. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Game as a service changes?
<--- Score
42. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
43. Do you all define Game as a service in the same way?
<--- Score
44. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
45. Is Game as a service required?
<--- Score
46. Have all basic functions of Game as a service been defined?
<--- Score
47. What is the scope?
<--- Score
48. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
49. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
50. What gets examined?
<--- Score
51. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
52. Do you have a Game as a service success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
53. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
54. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Game as a service? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
55. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
56. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
57. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
58. What scope to assess?
<---
