<--- Score
65. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
66. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
67. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
68. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
69. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
70. Has the Line production work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
71. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Line production goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
72. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
73. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
74. Have all basic functions of Line production been defined?
<--- Score
75. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
76. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
77. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
78. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
79. How does the Line production manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
80. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Line production?
<--- Score
81. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
82. Is Line production currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
83. What is the context?
<--- Score
84. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
85. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
86. Are the Line production requirements complete?
<--- Score
87. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
88. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
89. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
90. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
91. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
92. How would you define Line production leadership?
<--- Score
93. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
94. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
95. Are the Line production requirements testable?
<--- Score
96. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
97. Is special Line production user knowledge required?
<--- Score
98. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
99. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
100. Who are the Line production improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
101. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
102. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
103. What happens if Line production’s scope changes?
<--- Score
104. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
105. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
106. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
107. Is the Line production scope manageable?
<--- Score
108. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
109. What is the scope of the Line production work?
<---
