<--- Score
43. Are accountability and ownership for Learning outcomes clearly defined?
<--- Score
44. Are the Learning outcomes requirements testable?
<--- Score
45. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
46. What Learning outcomes services do you require?
<--- Score
47. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
48. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Learning outcomes improvements?
<--- Score
49. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
50. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
51. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
52. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Learning outcomes?
<--- Score
53. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
54. How would you define Learning outcomes leadership?
<--- Score
55. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
56. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
57. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
58. What is the scope?
<--- Score
59. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
60. Are improvement team members fully trained on Learning outcomes?
<--- Score
61. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
62. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
63. How do you manage changes in Learning outcomes requirements?
<--- Score
64. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
65. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
66. When is/was the Learning outcomes start date?
<--- Score
67. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
68. Is special Learning outcomes user knowledge required?
<--- Score
69. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
70. How can the value of Learning outcomes be defined?
<--- Score
71. How are consistent Learning outcomes definitions important?
<--- Score
72. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
73. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
74. What gets examined?
<--- Score
75. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
76. Is Learning outcomes linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
77. Do you all define Learning outcomes in the same way?
<--- Score
78. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Learning outcomes goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
79. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
80. What is the context?
<--- Score
81. What is in scope?
<--- Score
82. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
83. How does the Learning outcomes manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
84. Do you have a Learning outcomes success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
85. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
86. Will team members perform Learning outcomes work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
87. Is there a Learning outcomes management charter, including stakeholder case,
