is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
14. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
15. What gets examined?
<--- Score
16. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
17. Do you have a Executive Support System success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
18. Is there any additional Executive Support System definition of success?
<--- Score
19. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
20. Is Executive Support System linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
21. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
22. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
23. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
24. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
25. Has a Executive Support System requirement not been met?
<--- Score
26. How do you hand over Executive Support System context?
<--- Score
27. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
28. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
29. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
30. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
31. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
32. How would you define Executive Support System leadership?
<--- Score
33. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
34. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
35. Are the Executive Support System requirements complete?
<--- Score
36. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
37. Will team members regularly document their Executive Support System work?
<--- Score
38. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
39. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
40. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
41. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
42. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Executive Support System brings?
<--- Score
43. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
44. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
45. When is/was the Executive Support System start date?
<--- Score
46. Is there a critical path to deliver Executive Support System results?
<--- Score
47. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
48. How do you gather Executive Support System requirements?
<--- Score
49. Who are the Executive Support System improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
50. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
51. How have you defined all Executive Support System requirements first?
<--- Score
52. Is the Executive Support System scope manageable?
<--- Score
53. How do you manage changes in Executive Support System requirements?
<--- Score
54. How will the Executive Support System team and the group measure complete success of Executive Support System?
<--- Score
55. What would be the goal or target for a Executive Support System’s improvement team?
<--- Score
56. Who is gathering Executive Support System information?
<--- Score
