Genomic and Epigenomic Biomarkers of Toxicology and Disease. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Genomic and Epigenomic Biomarkers of Toxicology and Disease - Группа авторов страница 47

Genomic and Epigenomic Biomarkers of Toxicology and Disease - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

style="font-size:15px;">      135 Young, J.L., Yan, X., Xu, J., Yin, X., Zhang, X., Arteel, G.E., Barnes, G.N., States, J.C., Watson, W.H., Kong, M., Cai, L., and Freedman, J.H. (2019). Cadmium and high-fat diet disrupt renal, cardiac and hepatic essential metals. Sci. Rep. 9: 14675.

      136 Yuan, W., Liu, L., Liang, L., Huang, K., Deng, Y., Dong, M., Chen, J., Wang, G., and Zou, F. (2020). MiR-122-5p and miR-326-3p: Potential novel biomarkers for early detection of cadmium exposure. Gene 724: 144156.

      137 Zampetaki, A., Albrecht, A., and Steinhofel, K. (2018). Long non-coding RNA structure and function: Is there a link? Front Physiol. 9: 1201.

      138 Zeng, Q., Zou, Z., Wang, Q., Sun, B., Liu, Y., Liang, B., Liu, Q., and Zhang, A. (2019). Association and risk of five miRNAs with arsenic-induced multiorgan damage. Sci. Total Environ. 680: 1–9.

      139 Zenobia, C. and Hajishengallis, G. (2015). Basic biology and role of interleukin-17 in immunity and inflammation. Periodontol 2000, 69: 142–159.

      140 Zhang, L., Gao, Y., Wu, S., Zhang, S., Smith, K.R., Yao, X., and Gao, H. (2020). Global impact of atmospheric arsenic on health risk: 2005 to 2015. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117: 13975–13982.

      141 Zheng, L., Jiang, Y.L., Fei, J., Cao, P., Zhang, C., Xie, G.F., Wang, L.X., Cao, W., Fu, L., and Zhao, H. (2021). Circulatory cadmium positively correlates with epithelial-mesenchymal transition in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 215: 112164.

      142 Zhou, Q. and Xi, S. (2018). A review on arsenic carcinogenesis: Epidemiology, metabolism, genotoxicity and epigenetic changes. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 99: 78–88.

       Lijin Zhu, Fangfang Zhang, Min Zhang, Hailing Xia, Xiuyuan Yuan, and Yanan Gao

       Hangzhou Medical College

      Pleural malignant mesothelioma (MM), which arises from the cells that line the lung and the chest cavity (pleura), is a highly aggressive tumor with a high recurrence rate after surgical resection, and is insensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The median survival time commonly does not exceed 12–18 months after diagnosis (Wright et al. 2013). Therefore biomarkers for early detection are imperative even for experienced pathologists (Wu et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2014). Approximately 80% of the cases of pleural MM are attributed to asbestos exposure, and the latency after exposure could be 20–60 years (Rascoe et al. 2012). Asbestos exposure, a genetic basis, and other factors are likely to contribute to the etiology of pleural MM (Robinson and Lake 2005).

      MicroRNA (miRNA) is a kind of highly conserved, non-coding, single-stranded small RNA with a length of 18–25 nucleotides (Kirschner et al. 2011). About 35,828 mature miRNAs have been found in human genome, which can be divided into 223 species; these miRNAs regulate one third of human genes. The same miRNA can regulate single or multiple target genes and, in turn, the same gene can be regulated by multiple miRNAs (Luo et al. 2010) . Here mature miRNAs bind to untranslated sequences at the 3ʹ-end of the target mRNA through base complementary pairing, to inhibit mRNA translation or degradation, thereby regulating gene expression and playing a role in promoting or inhibiting cancer.

      During the two decades since Calin et al. (2002) first discovered two miRNAs (miR-15 and miR-16) closely related to the occurrence of chronic lymphoblastic leukemia, miRNAs have been proved to play a key role in cancer progression, treatment response, and diagnosis (Berindan-Neagoe et al. 2014; Hata and Lieberman 2015). The tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressing effects of miRNAs in various cancers depend on their expression levels. More and more researchers have applied miRNAs to the diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors—for example the miR-200 family, miR-9, miR-34, miR-21, and miR-340 in the prognosis of pancreatic cancer (Zöller 2013) and miR-140 and miR-145 in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer (Banno et al., 2014).

      Methods for Detecting the Expression of miRNAs

      As a biomarker of human diseases, ideally the detection method of miRNA should not need expensive reagents and instruments and be easy to operate. Such a method should have good specificity for distinguishing miRNAs with similar sequences. At the same time, it should have sufficient sensitivity for quantitative analysis, even for micro clinical samples, and it should be able to detect multiple samples in parallel (de Planell-Saguer and Rodicio 2011; Van Roosbroeck, Pollet, and Calin 2013).

      The Gold Standard Conference believes that the method for meeting these requirements and for detecting miRNA in clinical laboratories is quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (qRT-PCR). miRNA microarray is more expensive than qRT-PCR and is normally used in the discovery stage of biomarkers.

      However, these methods all need to extract miRNAs from tumor samples of patients, which include non-tumor matrix and inflammatory cells in addition to malignant tumor cells. If the goal is to detect the specific expression of miRNA in malignant tumor cells, it is recommended to use flow cytometry to sort liquid tumors or laser capture microscopy to cut solid tumors. In situ hybridization technology (Sempere and Korc 2013) can also be used; it can detect target miRNA in different types of cells (malignant tumor cells or microenvironment cells) that constitute tumors. This method provides additional miRNA subcellular localization information. At present, the latest method for detecting miRNA expression is next-generation sequencing. This technique is highly sensitive and specific, can be used for high-throughput analysis, and can discover new miRNAs. Next-generation sequencing produces a large amount of complex data, which need to be analyzed by a trained bioinformatician; besides, the cost of single RNA sequencing is too high, so this method is not suitable for diagnosis but can still be considered as a screening method for miRNAs of interest (Berindan-Neagoe et al. 2014).

      Early Screening for Malignant Mesothelioma

      In view of the high degree of malignancy and difficult treatment of MM, early screening is particularly important in the prevention and treatment of the disease. At present, there have been studies designed to improve the detection rate of early MM patients by identifying the expression level of specific miRNAs in serum or plasma (Mujoomdar et al. 2010).

Скачать книгу