does Transaction payments as a service leverage and how?
<--- Score
91. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
92. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
93. Will team members regularly document their Transaction payments as a service work?
<--- Score
94. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Transaction payments as a service work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
95. How do you manage changes in Transaction payments as a service requirements?
<--- Score
96. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
97. What Transaction payments as a service requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
98. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
99. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
100. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
101. What are the Transaction payments as a service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
102. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
103. How does the Transaction payments as a service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
104. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
105. Who is gathering Transaction payments as a service information?
<--- Score
106. Is the Transaction payments as a service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
107. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
108. Who are the Transaction payments as a service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
109. What is the scope of the Transaction payments as a service work?
<--- Score
110. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Transaction payments as a service changes?
<--- Score
111. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
112. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
113. When is/was the Transaction payments as a service start date?
<--- Score
114. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
115. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
116. How do you hand over Transaction payments as a service context?
<--- Score
117. Is the Transaction payments as a service scope manageable?
<--- Score
118. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
119. What are the record-keeping requirements of Transaction payments as a service activities?
<--- Score
120. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
121. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
122. How do you think the partners involved in Transaction payments as a service would have defined success?
<--- Score
123. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Transaction payments as a service results are met?
<--- Score
124. How did the Transaction payments as a service manager receive input to the development of a Transaction payments as a service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
125. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Transaction payments as a service?
<--- Score
126. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
127. What is the scope of the Transaction payments as a service effort?
<--- Score
128. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
129. How would you define Transaction payments as a service leadership?
<--- Score
130. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
131. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
132. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Transaction payments as a service brings?
<--- Score
133.
