Process Group: Emergency Planning215
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Emergency Planning217
3.2 Change Request: Emergency Planning219
3.3 Change Log: Emergency Planning221
3.4 Decision Log: Emergency Planning223
3.5 Quality Audit: Emergency Planning225
3.6 Team Directory: Emergency Planning228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Emergency Planning230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Emergency Planning232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Emergency Planning234
3.10 Issue Log: Emergency Planning236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Emergency Planning238
4.1 Project Performance Report: Emergency Planning240
4.2 Variance Analysis: Emergency Planning242
4.3 Earned Value Status: Emergency Planning244
4.4 Risk Audit: Emergency Planning246
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Emergency Planning248
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Emergency Planning250
5.0 Closing Process Group: Emergency Planning252
5.1 Procurement Audit: Emergency Planning254
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Emergency Planning256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Emergency Planning258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Emergency Planning260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Does Emergency planning create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
2. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
3. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Emergency planning project?
<--- Score
4. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
5. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
6. Do you need to avoid or amend any Emergency planning activities?
<--- Score
7. What Emergency planning events should you attend?
<--- Score
8. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
9. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Emergency planning leader?
<--- Score
10. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
11. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Emergency planning delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
12. Have you identified your Emergency planning key performance indicators?
<--- Score
13. Which information does the Emergency planning business case need to include?
<--- Score
14. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
15. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
16. What information do users need?
<--- Score
17. Why the need?
<--- Score
18. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Emergency planning team, Emergency planning itself?
<--- Score
19. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
20. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
21. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
22. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
23. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
24. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
25. Do you recognize Emergency planning achievements?
<--- Score
26. Who needs to know about Emergency planning?
<--- Score
27. What situation(s) led to this Emergency planning Self Assessment?
<--- Score
28. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
29. Who needs
