the Emergency planning scope manageable?
<--- Score
59. How do you catch Emergency planning definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
60. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
61. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
62. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
63. What are the core elements of the Emergency planning business case?
<--- Score
64. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
65. What Emergency planning services do you require?
<--- Score
66. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
67. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
68. Is there a Emergency planning management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
69. How does the Emergency planning manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
70. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
71. What system do you use for gathering Emergency planning information?
<--- Score
72. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
73. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
74. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Emergency planning? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
75. What is the scope of Emergency planning?
<--- Score
76. How are consistent Emergency planning definitions important?
<--- Score
77. Will team members perform Emergency planning work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
78. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
79. How have you defined all Emergency planning requirements first?
<--- Score
80. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
81. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
82. Will team members regularly document their Emergency planning work?
<--- Score
83. What are (control) requirements for Emergency planning Information?
<--- Score
84. What is the scope of the Emergency planning work?
<--- Score
85. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
86. Do you all define Emergency planning in the same way?
<--- Score
87. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
88. How can the value of Emergency planning be defined?
<--- Score
89. What are the record-keeping requirements of Emergency planning activities?
<--- Score
90. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
91. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Emergency planning brings?
<--- Score
92. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
93. Is Emergency planning currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
94. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
95. How do you manage changes in Emergency planning requirements?
<--- Score
96. What Emergency planning requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
97. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
98. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
99. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
100. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
101. How would you define Emergency planning leadership?
<---
