Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
15. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Emergency planning changes?
<--- Score
16. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
17. Will a Emergency planning production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
18. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
19. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
20. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
21. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
22. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
23. Is the scope of Emergency planning defined?
<--- Score
24. Is special Emergency planning user knowledge required?
<--- Score
25. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
26. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
27. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
28. How did the Emergency planning manager receive input to the development of a Emergency planning improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
29. Is Emergency planning linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
30. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Emergency planning goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
31. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Emergency planning results are met?
<--- Score
32. Has a Emergency planning requirement not been met?
<--- Score
33. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
34. What are the Emergency planning use cases?
<--- Score
35. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
36. What gets examined?
<--- Score
37. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
38. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
39. How do you think the partners involved in Emergency planning would have defined success?
<--- Score
40. What is the scope of the Emergency planning effort?
<--- Score
41. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
42. What would be the goal or target for a Emergency planning’s improvement team?
<--- Score
43. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
44. Is there a clear Emergency planning case definition?
<--- Score
45. Has the Emergency planning work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
46. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
47. What happens if Emergency planning’s scope changes?
<--- Score
48. What is the context?
<--- Score
49. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
50. Is the Emergency planning scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
51. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
52. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
53. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
54. How do you hand over Emergency planning context?
<--- Score
55. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
56. How do you gather Emergency planning requirements?
<--- Score
57. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
58.
