Score
102. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
103. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
104. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
105. What sources do you use to gather information for a Emergency planning study?
<--- Score
106. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
107. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
108. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
109. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
110. How will the Emergency planning team and the group measure complete success of Emergency planning?
<--- Score
111. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
112. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
113. Do you have a Emergency planning success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
114. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
115. When is/was the Emergency planning start date?
<--- Score
116. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
117. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
118. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Emergency planning?
<--- Score
119. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
120. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
121. What was the context?
<--- Score
122. Is there a critical path to deliver Emergency planning results?
<--- Score
123. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
124. Is Emergency planning required?
<--- Score
125. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
126. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Emergency planning leverage and how?
<--- Score
127. What are the Emergency planning tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
128. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
129. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
130. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
131. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
132. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
133. Is there any additional Emergency planning definition of success?
<--- Score
134. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
135. Who approved the Emergency planning scope?
<--- Score
136. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
137. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Emergency planning work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Emergency planning Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
2. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
3. What are the costs and benefits?
<---
