Score
59. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
60. What Automation management services do you require?
<--- Score
61. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automation management? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
62. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
63. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
65. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Automation management leverage and how?
<--- Score
66. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
67. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
68. Are the Automation management requirements testable?
<--- Score
69. What is the scope of Automation management?
<--- Score
70. Who are the Automation management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
71. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
72. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
73. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
74. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
75. What gets examined?
<--- Score
76. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
77. Is the Automation management scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
78. Will team members perform Automation management work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
79. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Automation management?
<--- Score
80. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Automation management results are met?
<--- Score
81. Has the Automation management work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
82. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
83. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
84. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
85. Is the Automation management scope manageable?
<--- Score
86. Is there a critical path to deliver Automation management results?
<--- Score
87. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
88. Do you all define Automation management in the same way?
<--- Score
89. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
90. What would be the goal or target for a Automation management’s improvement team?
<--- Score
91. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
92. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
93. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
94. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
95. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
96. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
97. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
98. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
99. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
100. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
101. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Automation management brings?
<--- Score
102.
