Adaptive Learning A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Adaptive Learning A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 7
58. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
59. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
60. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
61. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
62. What are the core elements of the Adaptive learning business case?
<--- Score
63. Is the Adaptive learning scope manageable?
<--- Score
64. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
65. Is Adaptive learning currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
66. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
67. How will the Adaptive learning team and the group measure complete success of Adaptive learning?
<--- Score
68. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
69. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
70. Who are the Adaptive learning improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
71. What is the scope of Adaptive learning?
<--- Score
72. Are accountability and ownership for Adaptive learning clearly defined?
<--- Score
73. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Adaptive learning?
<--- Score
74. Is there a clear Adaptive learning case definition?
<--- Score
75. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
76. Do you all define Adaptive learning in the same way?
<--- Score
77. What system do you use for gathering Adaptive learning information?
<--- Score
78. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
79. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
80. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
81. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
82. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Adaptive learning work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
83. What was the context?
<--- Score
84. How have you defined all Adaptive learning requirements first?
<--- Score
85. How does the Adaptive learning manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
86. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
87. How can the value of Adaptive learning be defined?
<--- Score
88. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
89. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
90. Will team members regularly document their Adaptive learning work?
<--- Score
91. When is/was the Adaptive learning start date?
<--- Score
92. What are the Adaptive learning use cases?
<--- Score
93. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
94. Will a Adaptive learning production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
95. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
96. What would be the goal or target for a Adaptive learning’s improvement team?
<--- Score
97. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
98. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
99. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
100. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
101. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
102.