Score
64. What is the context?
<--- Score
65. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
66. What is the definition of Process Thinking excellence?
<--- Score
67. Has the Process Thinking work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
68. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
69. What are the Process Thinking use cases?
<--- Score
70. Is Process Thinking currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
71. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Process Thinking? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
72. Why are you doing Process Thinking and what is the scope?
<--- Score
73. What are the core elements of the Process Thinking business case?
<--- Score
74. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
75. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
76. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
77. How do you think the partners involved in Process Thinking would have defined success?
<--- Score
78. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
79. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
80. Have all basic functions of Process Thinking been defined?
<--- Score
81. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
82. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
83. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
84. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Process Thinking changes?
<--- Score
85. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Process Thinking work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
86. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
87. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
88. Is the scope of Process Thinking defined?
<--- Score
89. Is the Process Thinking scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
90. Is Process Thinking linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
91. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
92. How do you manage changes in Process Thinking requirements?
<--- Score
93. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
94. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
95. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
96. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
97. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
98. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Process Thinking?
<--- Score
99. Who is gathering Process Thinking information?
<--- Score
100. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
101. When is/was the Process Thinking start date?
<--- Score
102. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
103. Is Process Thinking required?
<--- Score
104. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
105. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
106. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
107. Will team members perform
